kate_schaefer: (Default)
[personal profile] kate_schaefer
This week's sing-along was considerably less painful than last week's. There were places where I got lost, when the score switched from all choirs singing in unison to choir 1 and choir 2, or unison choirs with soloists on top, or both choirs and soloists, so that there could be three lines of music, or two, or just one on any given page, but overall Mozart makes more sense to me musically than Prokofiev. The Grand Mass in C has some astonishing intervals, but they are mostly allotted to the sopranos and particularly to the soprano soloist. It's a work written for Mozart's wife, who must have had a fabulous voice.

At the break, I remarked on how much easier this was than last week's Prokofiev and Rachmaninoff. Several other singers said they felt the same way, that they had all been glad that the summer started with the relatively easy Orff before the humiliation of Prokofiev and Rachmaninoff. I have no doubt that all of us would have been fine had we practiced ahead of time, but that's the trick with a read-through: you do as good a job as you can with whatever preparation you have, including no preparation at all in many cases. That will be the case for me again next week, when we sing Stravinsky's Symphony of Psalmn, which I have never even heard.

In other news, I retrieved my sewing machine today. It just needed a fuse replaced on its motherboard rather than a new motherboard, so it was a much less expensive repair than I had feared. Now I just need to be careful to pace myself while sewing.

If you aren't already reading [livejournal.com profile] wild_irises, take a look at her most recent entry, "Friendship Is NOT Disposable". I value Debbie's friendship way above rubies. I wish that everyone had as much dedication to talking through problems as she does. My life would not be simpler, but it would be richer in its complexity if I could convince other people to keep talking throughout difficult times rather than shutting out whatever is hard. The unbearable awkwardness of difficult and embarrassing conversations only lasts a little while. The unbearable awkwardness of not speaking lasts, well, at least as long as the silence. That one isn't speaking with one's non-interlocutor doesn't mean that that dialogue doesn't go on in both parties' heads; it just means that the dialogue in each person's head gets farther and farther from representing what the other person would really say or think or do, and the possibility of rapprochement gets more and more distant all the time.

Date: 2005-08-05 10:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
I like your last paragraph quite a bit. It's a good explanation for why processing is important. I've gone off processing recently; in fact, I walked away from a fairly long term friend because I felt like she was doing nothing BUT processing a bad relationship endlessly, endlessly. Thank you.

And I'm always glad to hear about the singing. Yeah!

Date: 2005-08-05 10:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kate-schaefer.livejournal.com
You're welcome. That was my phrasing, but I got my best understanding of the concept from talking with Jane, a true champion of useful processing.

For me, it's useful to talk about stuff with someone other than the person with whom I have Issues in order to get perspective, but if the relationship with the person with whom I have Issues is going to go anywhere, I have to take that perspective back to the Issue person and crunch through those damn Issues. If too much time goes by without crunching, either the Issues are all dried up and too crunchy, or they're soggy from sitting in the milk and maybe have a layer of mold grown on top, and I just throw away the whole bowl and maybe never eat breakfast again.

Date: 2005-08-05 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
More Stuff I'll try to keep in mind.

("While Kate wrestles the wild metaphor to the ground, we pause for this message from Mutual of ChuckleHah.")

Date: 2005-08-05 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"That one isn't speaking with one's non-interlocutor doesn't mean that that dialogue doesn't go on in both parties' heads; it just means that the dialogue in each person's head gets farther and farther from representing what the other person would really say or think or do, and the possibility of rapprochement gets more and more distant all the time."

Most excellent point, , and finely said, which is why I break silence and make this comment.

-- completely non-anonymous Gary Farber
gfarber@yahoo.com
http://amygdalagf.blogspot.com

"No claimed id: no_identity_server: The provided URL doesn't declare its OpenID identity server."

Okay, I have no idea what this means, or if you'll ever read this, I guess. Why I love LiveJournal, as usual. Not.

Date: 2005-08-05 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Um, well, yes, hi, too.

I do tend to babble on my blog, by the way. Understanding that, as you last told me, when I last mentioned this, that you "don't do blogs." I'm just noting that I've said a lot of stuff, if you wish to catch up to what I'm up to lately, perhaps. No ob, of course.

Hi.

Hi.

Date: 2005-08-05 10:06 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oh, and this totally doesn't work. I had a brain fart.
gfarber@yahoo.com

That doesn't work for me. Sorry. Anything sent there didn't get to me.

gary_farber@yahoo.com works. The other doesn't. Total brain fart. Apologies.

Profile

kate_schaefer: (Default)
kate_schaefer

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 11:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios